News

  • Human rights organizations call to release five more political prisoners

    We assess the persecution of Aliaksandr Khrapko, Ihar Vinakurau, Eduard Kudyniuk, Aliaksandr Viniarski and Sofia Sapegaas politically motivated, as it is related solely to their exercise of freedom of peaceful assembly and expression and recognize them as political prisoners. //
  • TUT.BY employees are political prisoners

    The authorities’ references to economic violations, which allegedly led to the outlet’s persecution, have been actively used for many years to justify repressive measures against human rights defenders, the media, and independent trade unions. //
  • Immediately release political prisoner Raman Pratasevich!

    Raman Pratasevich’s public activity is nothing but the peaceful exercise of the freedoms guaranteed by both the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus and international human rights law, the freedom to seek and disseminate information and to express one's opinion, among others. //
  • UN WORKING GROUP ON FORCED OR INVOLUNTARY DISAPPEARANCES INFORMED ABOUT DISAPPEARANCE OF YULYA CHARNIAUSKAJA

    According to its mandate, the UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances is to receive, consider, and transmit allegations of enforced disappearances reported by relatives of missing persons or human rights organisations representing their interests. The Working group urges the states concerned to investigate the cases and inform the Working group of the results. //
  • Vasil Pilets is a political prisoner

    The court arbitrarily assessed the evidence presented to it and rendered a verdict contrary to the evidence established during the examination of the case file. The case file included surveillance camera video footage, which confirmed the circumstances of the conflict, as claimed by the defendant, who plead not guilty. Contrary to this evidence, the court found that the defendant had committed a number of illegal acts against the victim Bandarava in the same place immediately after the self-defense actions recorded on video, solely on the basis of the victims’ testimonies, which contradicted other case material. //
  • Pages